On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 3:35 PM, Daniel P. Berrange <berrange@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 03:22:57PM +0100, Christian Ehrhardt wrote: >> Hi, >> on libvirt 3.10 I see a set of qemu processes used for capability >> probing [1] (in my case 8x x86_64 and 3xi386 which seems a lot, but >> ok). >> But when stopping the service those still stay around [2]. >> >> That is correct for guests that were started by libvirt as their >> lifecycle isn't tied to the libvirtd service. But those probes are >> IMHO tied to the service. >> >> At first this might seem non-relevant, but e.g. when users want to >> uninstall they might think on stopping their guests, but I'd assume no >> one will clean up the capability probes before the hard removal. >> But then on the removal scripts will run into issues e.g. failing to >> remove users as they are still in use by those qemu processes. >> >> Right now Distro's have to be aware to clean those up at least at >> times where packaging would expect them to be gone, but I wanted to >> ask if there would be a consensus that it would be "correct" to stop >> the processes on a libvirtd stop? > > Well in general they should all be killed immediately after libvirt > finishes probing the capabilities - they should only live for a fraction > of a second. Yes that is how it always was before. I expected something in a more recent libvirt was changed to keep them around and thereby debugged in the wrong direction. Just recently ~1h ago it resolved in my test environment to no more show up hanging after a restart of libvirtd. > If these are getting stuck, it is an indication of a bug somewhere > in either QEMU or libvirt. So from that POV, the "correct" way to > stop them would be to find and fix the bug that is preventing them > being killed. I wish I'd have thought that way of it while it still occurred. Thanks a lot for the hint Daniel, now at least everything makes sense. Next time I see this I know which way to look at it and will gather debug data - for now it seems unreproducible even in a new test environment :-/ > Regards, > Daniel > -- > |: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :| > |: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :| > |: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :| -- Christian Ehrhardt Software Engineer, Ubuntu Server Canonical Ltd -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list