On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 11:15:34AM +0100, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> On Thu, 2017-11-23 at 17:35 +0100, Pavel Hrdina wrote:
> > > @@ -3585,6 +3585,7 @@
> > > <value>isa</value>
> > > <value>usb</value>
> > > <value>pci</value>
> > > + <value>spapr-vio</value>
> >
> > Since we cannot reduce isa-serial into isa, I guest having spapr-vio in
> > addition to other ${BUS}-serial would be weird, so how about
> > spapr-vio-serial or even only spapr-serial?
>
> See my other message about how I'm not quite yet convinced we
> can't drop the -serial suffix from existing values :)
>
> In any case the bus name is "spapr-vio" (confirmed with the ppc64
> QEMU maintainer), so it will have to be either spapr-vio or
> spapr-vio-serial.
In that case spapr-vio-serial is the correct name.
Pavel
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
