On 11/13/2017 08:07 AM, xinhua.Cao wrote: > Still because of commit id 'fe8f1c8b' where we generate a REF for the > Register and that's transparent to the consumer (e.g. how would they > know they need to ensure that Deregister is called), thus the purpose of > this patch is to find a way to Deregister if it's determined that the > consumer hasn't by the time of the "last" REF we'd have. > This solution to this problem is to alter the processing to have the > remoteClientCloseFunc handle performing the Deregister calls instead of > the remoteClientFreeFunc because there's no way FreeFunc would be called > unless the Deregister was already called. > --- > daemon/remote.c | 10 ++++++---- > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > Reviewed-by: John Ferlan <jferlan@xxxxxxxxxx> John NB: Prior to pushing I want to give enough time for anyone else to pipe in over the implementation. I know Martin had expressed some interest - so it's essentially time to allow him to register any objections... I figure at least 24 hours should be good enough, but it could be Wednesday too... -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
