On 10/27/2017 02:45 PM, Christian Borntraeger wrote: > > > On 10/27/2017 02:31 PM, Halil Pasic wrote: > gs is explicitly disabled. >> >> Now that I think about it, maybe the 2.9 binary is going to reject >> the explicit gs flag altogether, because it's unknown. >> >> Isn't this a problem? > > No. This is exactly the _solution_ and not the problem. The target will reject > unknown cpu features and migration will be aborted. This is exactly what the CPU > model is for. FWIW, I think in your particular case the QEMU will reject the z14 cpu and not even come to checking the gs. -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
