On 27.10.2017 08:26, John Ferlan wrote: > From: Nikolay Shirokovskiy <nshirokovskiy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > The problem is incorrect order of qemu driver shutdown and shutdown > of netserver threads that serve client requests (thru qemu driver > particularly). > > Net server threads are shutdown upon dispose which is triggered > by last daemon object unref at the end of main function. At the same > time qemu driver is shutdown earlier in virStateCleanup. As a result > netserver threads see invalid driver object in the middle of request > processing. > > Let's move shutting down netserver threads earlier to virNetDaemonClose. > > Note: order of last daemon unref and virStateCleanup > is introduced in 85c3a182 for a valid reason. > > Signed-off-by: John Ferlan <jferlan@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > src/rpc/virnetdaemon.c | 2 ++ > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/src/rpc/virnetdaemon.c b/src/rpc/virnetdaemon.c > index d970c47ad4..7cb3214166 100644 > --- a/src/rpc/virnetdaemon.c > +++ b/src/rpc/virnetdaemon.c > @@ -882,6 +882,8 @@ virNetDaemonClose(virNetDaemonPtr dmn) > virObjectLock(dmn); > > virHashForEach(dmn->servers, daemonServerClose, NULL); > + virHashRemoveAll(dmn->servers); > + dmn->servers = NULL; Setting NULL is not good, we leak hash table memory. Originally I call virHashFree instead of virHashRemoveAll thus this line. But calling virHashFree earlier then dispose is dangerous I agee with you here, virHashRemoveAll is better. > > virObjectUnlock(dmn); > } > -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
