Daniel Veillard wrote:
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 09:50:10AM -0400, Bryan Kearney wrote:
Daniel Veillard wrote:
As a result this makes an huge change in the way things are processed
or generated. I'm unable to really assert if it is really positive for
the project and Java devel or will give us more problem down the line.
I think in the end my opinion is probably not very important as I'm
not a Java head, but I'm still left wondering !
I believe that ant is more "typical" to java build then the autobuild
tooling. In addition, with the removal of the c code.. much of the
makefile magic from autobuild is no longer needed. I am happy to discuss
moving it back to autobuild if this is a big issue.
Well ... I should not be the one giving the direction here, I guess
Java people are far more used to build with ant than auto* . This can
probably provide portability to Windows for free too (assuming we
can interface with mingw build, which would be nice to test and fix
if needed at some point).
Let's say I'm surprized but in retrospect this is normal :-)
I will take this to mean "I hate ant, but if it make the java folks
happy.. ok.. since I dont have to maintian it". Is that fair?
:)
-- bk
--
Libvir-list mailing list
Libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list