Daniel Veillard wrote:
On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 08:02:16AM -0400, Bryan Kearney wrote:
Humpf ....
diff --git a/build.xml b/build.xml
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..e1ee51f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/build.xml
@@ -0,0 +1,82 @@
+<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
+<project name="Libvirt Java Bindings" default="build">
+ <property file="build.properties"/>
+ <property name="jar" value="libvirt-${version}"/>
+ <property name="jar.file" value="target/${jar}.jar"/>
+ <property name="src" value="libvirt-java-${version}"/>
+ <property name="src.file" value="target/${src}.tar.gz"/>
+ <property name="spec" value="libvirt-java.spec"/>
+ <property name="spec.file" value="target/${spec}"/>
Do we really need to switch to ant ? I mean I love XML but that
really wasn't designed for that kind of stuff, really !
+
+ <path id="compile.classpath">
+ <fileset dir="/usr/share/java">
+ <include name="jna.jar"/>
+ </fileset>
+ </path>
As a result this makes an huge change in the way things are processed
or generated. I'm unable to really assert if it is really positive for
the project and Java devel or will give us more problem down the line.
I think in the end my opinion is probably not very important as I'm
not a Java head, but I'm still left wondering !
I believe that ant is more "typical" to java build then the autobuild
tooling. In addition, with the removal of the c code.. much of the
makefile magic from autobuild is no longer needed. I am happy to discuss
moving it back to autobuild if this is a big issue.
-- bk
--
Libvir-list mailing list
Libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list