On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 06:24:47PM +0200, Andrea Bolognani wrote: > On Tue, 2017-10-17 at 17:57 +0200, Pavel Hrdina wrote: > > I wouldn't include Ubuntu related things. Yes, we use travis where they > > have Ubuntu nodes, but this is jenkins-ci repository where we don't use > > Ubuntu at all. > > While a sane CI setup is definitely the primary reason why this work > is happening, a secondary goal is making it possible for (potential) > developers to ensure portability and debug build issues on platforms > that they don't already have easy access to. The overlap between the > two goals is basically 99% anyway. > > Moreover, if some build job fails on Travis, it would be nice to > quickly reproduce the failure locally[1] instead of doing multiple > round-trips to Travis. So I vote for keeping the Ubuntu bits, > especially considering that the overhead is literally 9 lines :) Yeah, I think it is reasonable to have Ubuntu support. Travis is somewhat performance limited, so if we ever get more CI hardware of our own I would expect us to move Ubuntu jobs off Travis. The only key unique thing about Travis is ability to build on OS-X - we can't easily replicate that ourselves due to OS-X restrictive licensing. Regards, Daniel -- |: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :| |: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :| |: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :| -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
