Re: [PATCH v5 3/6] udev: Split udevEventHandleCallback in two functions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 10/11/2017 10:52 AM, Erik Skultety wrote:
> This patch splits udevEventHandleCallback in two (introduces
> udevEventHandleThread) in order to be later able to refactor the latter
> to actually become a normal thread which will wait some time for the
> kernel to create the whole sysfs tree for a device as we cannot do that
> in the event loop directly.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Erik Skultety <eskultet@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  src/node_device/node_device_udev.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
>  1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/src/node_device/node_device_udev.c b/src/node_device/node_device_udev.c
> index bb9787fdb..f7646cd8a 100644
> --- a/src/node_device/node_device_udev.c
> +++ b/src/node_device/node_device_udev.c
> @@ -1691,32 +1691,49 @@ udevEventMonitorSanityCheck(udevEventDataPtr priv,
>  
>  
>  static void
> +udevEventHandleThread(void *opaque)
> +{
> +    udevEventDataPtr priv = driver->privateData;
> +    int fd = (intptr_t) opaque;
> +    struct udev_device *device = NULL;
> +

To go along with my thought from patch 2, should there be a "if (!priv)"
check here too?  I believe it doesn't matter yet because there are
driver level locks that would seemingly prevent the thread code from
running if Cleanup occurs, but soon enough that won't be the case.

Reviewed-by: John Ferlan <jferlan@xxxxxxxxxx>

John

> +    virObjectLock(priv);
> +
> +    if (!udevEventMonitorSanityCheck(priv, fd)) {
> +        virObjectUnlock(priv);
> +        return;
> +    }
> +
> +    device = udev_monitor_receive_device(priv->udev_monitor);
> +    virObjectUnlock(priv);
> +
> +    if (device == NULL) {
> +        virReportError(VIR_ERR_INTERNAL_ERROR, "%s",
> +                       _("udev_monitor_receive_device returned NULL"));
> +        return;
> +    }
> +
> +    udevHandleOneDevice(device);
> +    udev_device_unref(device);
> +}
> +
> +
> +static void
>  udevEventHandleCallback(int watch ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED,
>                          int fd,
>                          int events ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED,
>                          void *data ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED)
>  {
>      udevEventDataPtr priv = driver->privateData;
> -    struct udev_device *device = NULL;
>  
>      virObjectLock(priv);
> -
>      if (!udevEventMonitorSanityCheck(priv, fd)) {
>          virObjectUnlock(priv);
>          return;
>      }
> -
> -    device = udev_monitor_receive_device(priv->udev_monitor);
>      virObjectUnlock(priv);
>  
> -    if (device == NULL) {
> -        virReportError(VIR_ERR_INTERNAL_ERROR, "%s",
> -                       _("udev_monitor_receive_device returned NULL"));
> -        return;
> -    }
> -
> -    udevHandleOneDevice(device);
> -    udev_device_unref(device);
> +    udevEventHandleThread((void *)(intptr_t) fd);
>  }
>  
>  
> 

--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list



[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]
  Powered by Linux