On Tue, Oct 03, 2017 at 12:58:57PM +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote:
There's one 'return' in the middle of the function body. It's very easy to miss and so it makes adding new code harder. Also the function doesn't follow our style 100%. Signed-off-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@xxxxxxxxxx> --- src/conf/domain_conf.c | 174 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 93 insertions(+), 81 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/conf/domain_conf.c b/src/conf/domain_conf.c index 87192eb2d..0bc2e2f94 100644 --- a/src/conf/domain_conf.c +++ b/src/conf/domain_conf.c @@ -6364,102 +6452,26 @@ virDomainDeviceInfoParseXML(xmlNodePtr node, } if (rom) { - char *rombar = virXMLPropString(rom, "bar"); - if (rombar && + if ((rombar = virXMLPropString(rom, "bar")) &&
If this is what you meant by "follow our coding style 100%", then I think you are wrong since this (IMHO bad) style is not explicitly mentioned, only (mis)used once. But I'm not fighting over it since I know more people prefer less readable code that saves one or two lines =) ACK
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list