On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 10:08:44AM -0400, John Ferlan wrote: > > > On 09/22/2017 09:28 AM, Andrea Bolognani wrote: > > While the "autoconfiscate" name is very clever and cute, the > > de-facto standard name for this kind of script is "autogen", and > > deviating from it means having to special-case the libvirt-cim > > project when, for example, setting up a CI environment. > > > > Signed-off-by: Andrea Bolognani <abologna@xxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > README | 2 +- > > autoconfiscate.sh => autogen.sh | 0 > > 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > rename autoconfiscate.sh => autogen.sh (100%) > > > > libvirt-cim has it's own mailing list (libvirt-cim@xxxxxxxxxx) and > achives: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvirt-cim/index.html. > > The last email there (april 2015) and last patch (aug 2014) - I venture > to say perhaps the "doesn't anyone really care" starts to factor in. > Then of course, is there a way (need/desire) to kill it completely? IBM was the only company that ever cared about CIM for virtualization. Everyone else wanted an API that was easy to use instead ;-P Even IBM has lost interest now, so it is mostly a historical curiosity at this point. I wouldn't delete it, but also wouldn't spend alot of time in it. If someone does have a desire to update the code in any way, go at it and we can review it in the normal manner - no point waiting for the original maintainers to review IMHO. Regards, Daniel -- |: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :| |: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :| |: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :| -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
