Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] Be more selective when determining cdrom for taint messaging

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 09/18/2017 09:12 AM, Michal Privoznik wrote:
> On 09/11/2017 04:32 PM, John Ferlan wrote:
>> v1: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2017-September/msg00103.html
>>
>> Changes since v1:
>>
>>  Split into 3 parts... The first patch would be the bare minimum using
>>  STRPREFIX instead of STREQ type comparisons for the incoming path to
>>  be "/dev/cdrom[N]" or "/dev/srN" (or resolved to that).
>>
>>  This would "work" for the most part, but then since it's possible to 
>>  make even more checks let's check against the collected node device
>>  data. Patch 2 therefore will "tag" the already collected cdrom data
>>  with a capability. This allows patch3 to find any/all CDROM's on the
>>  host and compare the resolved path to that list of devices returning
>>  "true" if something matches a node device declared physical CDROM.
>>
>> I split things up mainly to make it easier to decide whether patch 1
>> is sufficient or not. If patch2 and patch3 are OK, I would also add
>> a release note indicating the improvement to find CDROM by node device
>> capability.  It's a separate "improvement" on it's own as well. Whether
>> it's truly useful or not, is a different question...
> 
> [1]
> 
>>
>> John Ferlan (3):
>>   qemu: Be more selective when determining cdrom for taint messaging
> 
> ACK to this one ^^
> 
>>   nodedev: Add capability bit to detect 'cdrom' devices
>>   qemu: Add inquiry to nodedev for cdrom taint checking
> 
> However, these two ^^ look like an overkill to me. It's still just a
> taint message that nobody cares about. Or?
> 1: Yeah, I don't think we really need such a big hammer for tiny nail.
> But I might be missing something.
> 
> Michal
> 

I agree with you, but just in case someone wanted to use that sledge
hammer in order to catch some really obscure corner condition, I figured
I'd show it was possible...

Still I can give it a few more days to see if someone indicates they
would also like to see usage of the sledge hammer.

John

--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list



[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]
  Powered by Linux