Commit id '5604c056' used the wrong API to generate the <secret type='%s'..." field. The previous code used the correct API as was done in commit id '6887af39'. The data is actually a usage type not an auth type even though the result is the same. Signed-off-by: John Ferlan <jferlan@xxxxxxxxxx> --- src/util/virstoragefile.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/util/virstoragefile.c b/src/util/virstoragefile.c index e94ad32f0..1040e9a17 100644 --- a/src/util/virstoragefile.c +++ b/src/util/virstoragefile.c @@ -44,6 +44,7 @@ #include "virbuffer.h" #include "virjson.h" #include "virstorageencryption.h" +#include "virsecret.h" #define VIR_FROM_THIS VIR_FROM_STORAGE @@ -2546,7 +2547,7 @@ virStorageSourceParseRBDColonString(const char *rbdstr, goto error; if (VIR_STRDUP(authdef->secrettype, - virStorageAuthTypeToString(VIR_STORAGE_AUTH_TYPE_CEPHX)) < 0) + virSecretUsageTypeToString(VIR_SECRET_USAGE_TYPE_CEPH)) < 0) goto error; src->auth = authdef; authdef = NULL; -- 2.13.5 -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list