On Mon, 4 Sep 2017 08:49:33 +0200 Martin Kletzander <mkletzan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, Sep 01, 2017 at 04:31:50PM +0200, Wim ten Have wrote: > >On Thu, 31 Aug 2017 16:36:58 +0200 > >Martin Kletzander <mkletzan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > >> >diff --git a/src/conf/cpu_conf.c b/src/conf/cpu_conf.c > >> >index c21d11d..8d804a1 100644 > >> >--- a/src/conf/cpu_conf.c > >> >+++ b/src/conf/cpu_conf.c > >> >@@ -642,7 +642,7 @@ virCPUDefFormatBufFull(virBufferPtr buf, > >> > if (virCPUDefFormatBuf(&childrenBuf, def, updateCPU) < 0) > >> > goto cleanup; > >> > > >> >- if (virDomainNumaDefCPUFormat(&childrenBuf, numa) < 0) > >> >+ if (virDomainNumaDefCPUFormatXML(&childrenBuf, numa) < 0) > >> > goto cleanup; > > > >> Changing function names should be separate patch. Why is this > >> changed anyway? > > > >I renamed virDomainNumaDefCPUFormat() to virDomainNumaDefCPUFormatXML() > >to make it consistent with already existing function names like > > virDomainNumaDefCPUParseXML() > > > > Then put it in a separate patch. Sure. Do you advise me to put this patch in same or in a separated set? - Wim. -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
