On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 06:28:27PM -0400, John Ferlan wrote:
Alter wipeVol to do same refresh operation as pool refresh would do.
I think we should rather keep the format as it is. Did I miss something here or isn't the source of the problem just the fact that we wipe the volume without keeping the format?
John Ferlan (2): storage: Introduce virStorageBackendRefreshVolTargetUpdate storage: Use virStorageBackendRefreshVolTargetUpdate after wipeVol src/storage/storage_driver.c | 7 ++-- src/storage/storage_util.c | 82 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------- src/storage/storage_util.h | 3 ++ 3 files changed, 62 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-) -- 2.9.5 -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
