On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 05:54:07PM -0600, Jim Fehlig wrote: > The virDomainDef created by testBuildDomainDef in securityselinuxtest > adds a seclabel but does not increment nseclabels. Also, it should > populate seclabel->model with 'selinux'. > > While at it, use the secdef itself to populate values instead of > the indirection through def->seclabels[0]. > > Signed-off-by: Jim Fehlig <jfehlig@xxxxxxxx> > --- > tests/securityselinuxtest.c | 14 +++++++++----- > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/tests/securityselinuxtest.c b/tests/securityselinuxtest.c > index 767b6cc02..f6143fb06 100644 > --- a/tests/securityselinuxtest.c > +++ b/tests/securityselinuxtest.c > @@ -73,24 +73,28 @@ testBuildDomainDef(bool dynamic, > if (!(def = virDomainDefNew())) > goto error; > > + def->virtType = VIR_DOMAIN_VIRT_KVM; > if (VIR_ALLOC_N(def->seclabels, 1) < 0) > goto error; > > + def->nseclabels++; Personally, I'd put the increment after assigning secdef to the domain definition, but the memory chunk is zeroed out, so it doesn't matter at all. ACK Erik -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
