Ping - opinions on this or is it ready to be committed?
On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 8:58 PM, intrigeri <intrigeri+libvirt@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi,
Christian Ehrhardt:
> With that qemu change in place the rules generated for the image
> and backing files need the allowance to also lock (k) the files.
I'm not a C developer so I cannot review the proposed patch, but FWIW
Christian's reasoning makes sense to me and from a high-level AppArmor
perspective, the proposed change seems entirely harmless.
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
Christian Ehrhardt
Software Engineer, Ubuntu Server
Canonical Ltd
-- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list