On Tue, 2017-08-08 at 10:06 -0400, Laine Stump wrote: > > + The reason for this apparent limitation is the fact that each > > + hotplugged PCI device might require additional PCI controllers to > > + be added to the guest, and libvirt has no way of knowing in advance > > + how many devices will be hotplugged during the guest's lifetime, > > + thus making it impossible to automatically provide the right amount > > + of PCI controllers: any arbitrary number would end up being too big > > + for some users, and too small for others. > > Of course we all know this, but you haven't said here that PCI > controllers in general cannot themselves be hotplugged (although the new > pcie-pci-bridge *will* be hotpluggable, as long as the OS supports that). That's a good point, I'll mention it. > > + <h3><a name="x86_64-q35">q35 machine type</a></h3> > > + > > + <p> > > + This is a PCI Express native machine type. The default PCI topology > > + looks like > > + </p> > > + > > +<pre> > > +<controller type='pci' index='0' model='pcie-root'/> > > +<controller type='pci' index='1' model='pcie-root-port'> > > + <model name='pcie-root-port'/> > > + <target chassis='1' port='0x10'/> > > + <address type='pci' domain='0x0000' bus='0x00' slot='0x01' function='0x0'/> > > +</controller></pre> > > + > > + <p> > > + and supports hotplugging a single PCI Express device, either > > + emulated or assigned from the host. > > + </p> > > Didn't we include some trick in there (requested for libguestfs > appliances) that allows creating a config that has no pcie-root-ports? Yeah, we had something like that but I can't recall the specifics at the moment. I'll look it up and add a note about it. > > + <code>pcie-root-port</code> controller. If you plan to hotplug > > + more than a single PCI Express device, you should add a suitable > > + number of <code>pcie-root-port</code> controllers when defining > > + the guest: for example, add > > + </p> > > + > > +<pre> > > +<controller type='pci' model='pcie-root-port'/> > > +<controller type='pci' model='pcie-root-port'/> > > +<controller type='pci' model='pcie-root-port'/></pre> > > + > > + <p> > > + if you expect to hotplug up to three PCI Express devices, > > + either emulated or assigned from the host. That's all the > > + information you need to provide: libvirt will fill in the > > + remaining details automatically. > > + </p> > > Maybe a note here pointing out that if you add root-ports and new > endpoint devices at the same time, the endpoint devices will > automatically be attached to the manually added root-ports, so if you're > trying to end up with spares, you'll need to manually add enough for the > endpoints, plus the number of spares you want (you won't need to address > any of the controllers or endpoints though). Sure. > > + <p> > > + If you expect to hotplug legacy PCI devices, then you will need > > + specialized controllers, since all those mentioned above are > > + intended for PCI Express devices only: add > > + </p> > > + > > +<pre> > > +<controller type='pci' model='dmi-to-pci-bridge'/> > > +<controller type='pci' model='pci-bridge'/></pre> > > + > > + <p> > > + and you'll be able to hotplug up to 31 legacy PCI devices, > > + either emulated or assigned from the host. > > + </p> > > Maybe mention that it's slot 1 - 31 because slot 0 is reserved. Not sure that's necessarily in scope for the document, since in general you'll let libvirt pick the slot for you. That said, adding it would hardly make a difference when it comes to document size, so why not I guess :) > > + <p> > > + The default PCI topology for the <code>pseries</code> machine > > + type looks like > > + </p> > > + > > +<pre> > > +<controller type='pci' index='0' model='pcie-root'> > > You mean pci-root, right? (I always get these mixed up for PPC, since I > don't actually use it). Of course I did, and in fact I got it right right afterwards. Nice catch :) > There's of course always more that can be written, but this is a good > and useful start, so ACK (with the few typos fixed). Thanks, I've pushed it. I'll address the improvements you suggested next week. -- Andrea Bolognani / Red Hat / Virtualization -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list