On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 12:38:55PM -0400, John Ferlan wrote: > Rather than ignore errors, let's have virObjectLockRead check for > the correct usage and issue an error when not properly used so > so that we don't run into situations where the resource we think > we're locking really isn't locked because the void input parameter > wasn't valid. I agree with Dan that this doesn't give any benefit. We should rather consider start using abort() since this is a programming error, not something that depends on an input from user. It should not happen if if it does we have serious issues and abort is a best choice. Pavel
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
