Re: [PATCH 0/2] docs: Fix enum documentation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 07/24/2017 11:17 AM, Martin Kletzander wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 23, 2017 at 11:16:21PM +0200, Tomáš Golembiovský wrote:
>> On Sat, 22 Jul 2017 11:04:32 +0200
>> Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>> So this patch sent to the list got me roll up my sleeves and get
>>> working:
>>>
>>> https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2017-July/msg00835.html
>>>
>>> It wasn't that bad after all.
>>>
>>
>> Thanks for giving it a try!
>>
>> There is a slight progress, if we can call it so, but we're not there
>> yet. Looking at the generated docs for virDomainMemoryStatTags, there is
>> an issue, although different from the original.
>>
>> The comment for VIR_DOMAIN_MEMORY_STAT_SWAP_IN is now picked up
>> correctly. But VIR_DOMAIN_MEMORY_STAT_MINOR_FAULT has now the comment
>> that belongs to VIR_DOMAIN_MEMORY_STAT_UNUSED.
>>
> 
> Yeah, it doesn't fix everything, but thankfully it is strictly better
> than before.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Martin Kletzander <mkletzan@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> What Tomas is explaining here looks like a problem with parsing or
> cleaning up the comments.  It happens when there is a multiline comment
> for one enum value and the next one does not have any.  I tried looking
> at the code yet again and it hurts my brain.  But I'd still rather fix
> that than just work around it (add missing comments where it doesn't
> make much sense).

Actually, the fix was quite easy. In patch 1/2 I'm only appending to the
list of enums if both @commentsBeforeVal and @self.comment are set.
However, there's no real reason for testing self.comment. If the current
value the script is processing doesn't have a comment (like in this
case) then we should just not add one. To say it with patch:

diff --git i/docs/apibuild.py w/docs/apibuild.py
index 3a8f5d449..87e81f5c3 100755
--- i/docs/apibuild.py
+++ w/docs/apibuild.py
@@ -1408,7 +1408,7 @@ class CParser:
                         self.warning("Failed to compute value of enum %s" % (name))
                         value=""
                 if token[0] == "sep" and token[1] == ",":
-                    if commentsBeforeVal and self.comment is not None:
+                    if commentsBeforeVal:
                         self.cleanupComment()
                         self.enums.append((name, value, self.comment))
                         name = comment = self.comment = None

Anyway, what is still going to be broken are cases where we mix comments
before and after values. But well, I haven't found any just yet (haven't
looked hard though) and we can fix that later if we want.

I'm squashing that diff into 1/2 before pushing. Thanks for all the fish!

Michal

--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list




[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]
  Powered by Linux