On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 10:39:05 +0200, Andrea Bolognani wrote: > On Fri, 2017-07-21 at 10:07 +0200, Andrea Bolognani wrote: [...] > > That makes sense. > > > > Doesn't it also mean that we don't really need to record > > whether the user set the model name explicitly or not? We > > can just skip formatting it if it's spapr-pci-host-bridge > > and all versions of libvirt, past or future, will handle > > that correctly. > > Wait, that's exactly how this patch behaves, except it's > not immediately apparent because the check for the model > name happens inside virDomainControllerIsPCIHostBridge() > rather than being explicit. > > So maybe I'm still missing something? You are right. The not-formatting only the first model ever added should be fine in this case also in the future. Please send a fixed version of this patch that will make sure that it states that the PHB thing is a pSeries thing, so that it does not confuse others as it did me.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
