On 07/14/2017 05:28 AM, Erik Skultety wrote: >>>> cleanup: >>>> - if (obj) >>>> - virNodeDeviceObjUnlock(obj); >>>> + virNodeDeviceObjEndAPI(&obj); >>>> testDriverUnlock(driver); >>>> virNodeDeviceDefFree(def); >>>> virObjectUnref(dev); >>>> @@ -5596,13 +5595,13 @@ testNodeDeviceDestroy(virNodeDevicePtr dev) >>>> * taken, so we have to dup the parent's name and drop the lock >>>> * before calling it. We don't need the reference to the object >>>> * any more once we have the parent's name. */ >>> >>> Not that this patch would be touching it directly, but ^this commentary is >>> pretty much useless now, since @parent_name is useless in this function, >>> nodeDeviceDestroy doesn't work that way anymore. >>> >>> Erik >>> >> >> Hmmm, I see said the blind man. Looks like commit id '7ad479d0b' should >> have removed @parent_name as well. >> >> That should be a separate patch - I can create and add it to the end. > > Sure, that was the expected outcome :), judging by a quick look at the hunk > only, I don't see a problem having such patch at the beginning of the series, > do you hit any merge conflicts? > > Erik > Yes multiple... Mainly because I changed the comment. I could add it immediately after this patch without conflicts. John -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
