On 07/12/2017 04:17 AM, Pavel Hrdina wrote: > On Tue, May 09, 2017 at 11:30:14AM -0400, John Ferlan wrote: >> A virStoragePoolObjPtr will be an 'obj'. >> >> A virStoragePoolPtr will be a 'pool'. > > There is no such change in this commit. > Simple enough to remove. >> >> NB: Also modify the @matchpool to @matchobj. >> Signed-off-by: John Ferlan <jferlan@xxxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> src/conf/virstorageobj.c | 342 +++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------ >> src/conf/virstorageobj.h | 20 +-- >> 2 files changed, 180 insertions(+), 182 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/src/conf/virstorageobj.c b/src/conf/virstorageobj.c >> index dd41701..74a9c67 100644 >> --- a/src/conf/virstorageobj.c >> +++ b/src/conf/virstorageobj.c >> @@ -70,15 +70,15 @@ virStoragePoolObjListFree(virStoragePoolObjListPtr pools) >> >> void >> virStoragePoolObjRemove(virStoragePoolObjListPtr pools, >> - virStoragePoolObjPtr pool) >> + virStoragePoolObjPtr obj) > > This is why I'm not a fan of this change, to make the code consistent > we should also rename "pools" to "objs" which I don't like so probably > "objList" or something else. > > Pavel > I understand the objections and I agree @pools could be something else... Similarly @devs, @nwfilters, @secrets, @interfaces, etc. The difference between @pools and @pool/@obj is the usage of @pool/@obj wasn't consistent. At least there's only one @pools - OK, well two one in _virStorageDriverState and one in _testDriver. I guess that's the line I didn't cross. John -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
