On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 02:51:34PM -0400, John Ferlan wrote: > > > On 06/29/2017 02:05 PM, ZhiPeng Lu wrote: > > nl_recv() returns the error "No buffer space available" > > when using virsh destroy domain with 240 or more > > passhthrough network interfaces. > > pass-through > > > The patch increases libnl sock receive buffer size to 1M, > > and nl_recv() doesn't return error when destroying domain > > with 512 network interfaces. > > > > Signed-off-by: ZhiPeng Lu <lu.zhipeng@xxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > src/util/virnetlink.c | 4 ++-- > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > This feels like something that perhaps should be configurable - that is > some /etc/libvirt/libvirtd.conf variable; otherwise, we'll keep hitting > some conflated maximum based on the size of something. 1 MB matches what systemed/udevd uses, so if we hit that limit, then the system as a whole is going to struggle already. So I don't think we need make it configurable. Regards, Daniel -- |: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :| |: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :| |: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :| -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
