Re: [PATCH 07/10] apparmor, libvirt-qemu: Allow access to ceph config

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jun 07, 2017 at 07:00:56PM +0200, Guido Günther wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 07, 2017 at 10:44:59AM -0600, Christian Ehrhardt wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 2, 2017 at 12:57 PM, Guido Günther <agx@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > 
> > > Shouldn't this only be added when ceph is in use?
> > > Cheers,
> > >  -- Guido
> > >
> > 
> > Yeah it is part of a category of rules where in a perfect world we would
> > wirte virt-aa-helper code for each of them.
> > In this particular case I think the existance of the following would be the
> > trigger:
> > 
> > <disk type='network'>
> > [...]
> >     <source protocol="rbd"
> > 
> > Yet for some cases - like this one - the "opening" we are doing in regard
> > to apparmor is quite small and maybe the burden to create (and maintain) it
> > in virt-aa-helper is too much.
> > 
> > So I'd appreciate if that change could be considered as-is - otherwise
> > please let me know - I'll then add it to a bunch of issues of the category
> > "needs to be done in virt-aa-helper" which I already track.
> 
> I was uder the impression that ceph.conf might contain sensitive data
> which we might not want to open up to all domains but looking at
> 
>       http://docs.ceph.com/docs/jewel/rados/configuration/ceph-conf/
> 
> this does not seem to be the case so this is probably o.k.

Pushed. Thanks.
 -- Guido

--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list




[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]
  Powered by Linux