Re: [PATCH v2] Report more correct information for cache control

[Eli Qiao <qiaoliyong@xxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks martin,

Looks good to me.

On Friday, 9 June 2017 at 4:52 PM, Martin Kletzander wrote:

On some platforms the number of bits in the cbm_mask might not be

divisible by 4 (and not even by 2), so we need to properly count the

bits. Similar file, min_cbm_bits, is properly parsed and used, but if

the number is greater than one, we lose the information about

granularity when reporting the data in capabilities. For that matter

always report granularity, but if it is not the same as the minimum,

add that information in there as well.

Signed-off-by: Martin Kletzander <mkletzan@xxxxxxxxxx>

---

v2:

- More expressive comments for structure members

- Cache size adjusted to match the SKX machine (33M)

v1:

- https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2017-June/msg00229.html

ACK 

--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list