On 04/26/2017 12:36 AM, John Ferlan wrote: > Create/use a helper to perform the object allocation > > Signed-off-by: John Ferlan <jferlan@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > src/conf/virinterfaceobj.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++-------- > 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/src/conf/virinterfaceobj.c b/src/conf/virinterfaceobj.c > index 1cc5c92..4463653 100644 > --- a/src/conf/virinterfaceobj.c > +++ b/src/conf/virinterfaceobj.c > @@ -46,6 +46,27 @@ struct _virInterfaceObjList { > > /* virInterfaceObj manipulation */ > > +static virInterfaceObjPtr > +virInterfaceObjNew(void) > +{ > + virInterfaceObjPtr obj; > + > + if (VIR_ALLOC(obj) < 0) > + return NULL; > + > + if (virMutexInit(&obj->lock) < 0) { > + virReportError(VIR_ERR_INTERNAL_ERROR, > + "%s", _("cannot initialize mutex")); > + VIR_FREE(obj); > + return NULL; > + } > + > + virInterfaceObjLock(obj); > + > + return obj; > +} > + > + Any reason why virInterfaceObj can't actually be an virObject? virInterfaceObjLock() is so 0.9.X release-y. Michal -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list