Re: [PATCH] Don't inline virStringTrimOptionalNewline

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 09:26:18AM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
GCC complains that inlining virStringTrimOptionalNewline is not
likely on some platforms:

 cc1: warnings being treated as errors
 ../../src/util/virfile.c: In function 'virFileReadValueBitmap':
 ../../src/util/virstring.h:292: error: inlining failed in call to 'virStringTrimOptionalNewline': call is unlikely and code size would grow [-Winline]
 ../../src/util/virfile.c:3987: error: called from here [-Winline]

Inlining this function is not going to be a measurable performance
benefit either, since the time required to execute it is going to
be dominated by running of strlen() over the string, not by the
function call overhead.


Oh, definitely.  Just out of curiosity, though; what platform does this
happen on?

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list

[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]
  Powered by Linux