Daniel Veillard wrote: > On Thu, Jul 09, 2009 at 09:32:00AM +0200, Jim Meyering wrote: >> Daniel Veillard wrote: >> > A README in the top level directory exposing a GPL licence is >> > an invitation to confusion. So no I stand by this, too bad if this means >> > we need to rewrite the part instead of copying it. >> >> How about if I just remove the copyright notice from that new file >> (README-hacking)? Besides, then it'll be consistent with README, >> which has none. > > Just fine by me :-) I assumed the copyright notice was there on purpose ! Pushed. BTW, it was deliberate, in the original. Nearly every file in coreutils (even ChangeLog!) has some sort of copyright notice. I toe the line there, but sometimes it seems excessive. -- Libvir-list mailing list Libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list