On Wed, May 03, 2017 at 08:30:31AM +0800, Eli Qiao wrote: > hi all, > > Thanks for helping reviewing for CAT support in the past days. > > I writing this email to ask for the plan in libvirt support. > > I think we’v discussed this early this year, and I’v proposed a patch set [1]. > But don’t get merged because of some performance reason ? > > Then I proposed a redesign RFC[2] based on Martin’s cache branch, > thans Martin for the reviewing, I can address them but the question here > is it depends on Martin’s `cache` branch, which if for exposing host’s `cache` > information in capabilities xml, and it doesn’t get merged ether, I feel helpless. Martin posted review comments on your latest patches just a couple of days ago, and you've not posted any newer version of the patches since then that address those comments. > As CAT is a key feature which would be required by many customers and > especially the OpenStack integration. Regardless of what/who needs a feature, we're not going to rush to merge patches if there are still outstanding issues that need fixing. > Would like to know the plan and get the some suggestions. Carry on addressing the feedback provided & posting new versions of the patches for review. Regards, Daniel -- |: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :| |: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :| |: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :| -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
