Re: [PATCH 05/14] docs: schemas: Extract HTTP disk source specification

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 17:15:59 +0200, Peter Krempa wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 16:56:13 +0200, Jiri Denemark wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 19:52:35 +0200, Peter Krempa wrote:
> > > Make the schema more strict for HTTP disks requiring a name and
> > > mandating exactly one source host.
> > > 
> > > ftp/tftp entries were not moved here, since http transport also will
> > > support cookies and other options, which will be added later.
> > > ---
> > >  docs/schemas/domaincommon.rng | 16 ++++++++++++++--
> > >  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/docs/schemas/domaincommon.rng b/docs/schemas/domaincommon.rng
> > > index 05efea7f2..e3dc34e08 100644
> > > --- a/docs/schemas/domaincommon.rng
> > > +++ b/docs/schemas/domaincommon.rng
> > > @@ -1556,6 +1556,19 @@
> > >      </element>
> > >    </define>
> > > 
> > > +  <define name="diskSourceNetworkProtocolHTTP">
> > > +    <element name="source">
> > > +      <attribute name="protocol">
> > > +        <choice>
> > > +          <value>http</value>
> > > +          <value>https</value>
> > > +        </choice>
> > > +      </attribute>
> > > +      <attribute name="name"/>
> > 
> > The @name attribute was originally optional. Was it optional because
> > some protocols don't need it by http(s) needs the name? Or should it be
> > optional even for http(s)?
> 
> @name is optional only for NBD

Reviewed-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@xxxxxxxxxx>

--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list



[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]
  Powered by Linux