On 04/27/2017 10:19 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 09:01:59AM +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote: >> We prefer c89 style of comments. >> >> Signed-off-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@xxxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> examples/openauth/openauth.c | 2 +- >> src/lxc/lxc_controller.c | 2 +- >> src/remote/remote_driver.c | 2 +- >> src/rpc/virnetservermdns.c | 2 +- >> src/security/security_stack.c | 8 ++++---- >> src/uml/uml_conf.c | 2 +- >> src/util/virhostcpu.c | 4 ++-- >> src/util/virhostmem.c | 4 ++-- >> src/vbox/vbox_snapshot_conf.c | 2 +- >> tests/eventtest.c | 2 +- >> tests/virhostcpumock.c | 2 +- >> 11 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) > > How about a syntax-check rule to enforce this ? It's going to be not trivial. Consider: /* My awesome comment, that contains * http://an.url.com */ It's not easy to know that line 2 of the comment is already in comment. We can't just forbid all '//' strings. Michal -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
