On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 10:10:08AM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 11:06:54AM +0200, Kashyap Chamarthy wrote: [...] > > > I'd like to see us formally adopt the signed-off-by approach for all > > > patches as a mandatory thing, along with the associated contributor > > > convenant. > > > > By "contributor covenant", I presume you're referring to: > > > > http://contributor-covenant.org/ > > http://contributor-covenant.org/version/1/4/code_of_conduct.txt > > No, I mixed up the terms. What I actually meant was the Developer Certificate > of Origin > > https://developercertificate.org/ > > The use of a 'Signed-off-by' indicates acceptance of this DCO (or similar) > in projects which formally adopt S-o-B usage. Ah-ha, makes sense. Now I recall that the initiator of this is the Linux Kernel: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/submitting-patches.html#sign-your-work-the-developer-s-certificate-of-origin [...] -- /kashyap -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
