On Thu, 2017-04-13 at 10:28 -0500, Eric Blake wrote: > On 04/13/2017 10:19 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > > Aside from the licensing question, IMHO, the tar.xz should always contain > > all the files we have in GIT, Including .gitignore? ;) [...] > You have to have a really strong reason for making a tarball that is not > a superset of a git checkout, as it gets very hard to prove that the > tarball is then sufficient to create a fork (and the fact remains that > the GPL requires anyone getting a libvirt binary be afforded the chance > to fork from the same sources used to build that binary). I hadn't thought about the potential legal consequences: let's just stay on the safe side and leave the file in. -- Andrea Bolognani / Red Hat / Virtualization -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
