https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1439132 Fix some issues discovered when building between multiple different supported disk partition types. Commit id 'a48c674fb' added a check for format types "dvh" and "pc98" to use the parted print processing instead of using blkid processing in order to validate the label on the disk was what is expected for disk pool startup. However, commit id 'a4cb4a74f' really messed things up by missing an else condition causing PARTEDFindLabel to always return DIFFERENT. Signed-off-by: John Ferlan <jferlan@xxxxxxxxxx> --- Difference to v1: Pulled out specific patch and sent separately src/storage/storage_util.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/storage/storage_util.c b/src/storage/storage_util.c index 784df7a..4ced81e 100644 --- a/src/storage/storage_util.c +++ b/src/storage/storage_util.c @@ -3245,8 +3245,8 @@ virStorageBackendPARTEDFindLabel(const char *device, /* Does the on disk match what the pool desired? */ if (STREQ(start, format)) ret = VIR_STORAGE_PARTED_MATCH; - - ret = VIR_STORAGE_PARTED_DIFFERENT; + else + ret = VIR_STORAGE_PARTED_DIFFERENT; cleanup: virCommandFree(cmd); -- 2.9.3 -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
