On Thursday, 6 April 2017 at 5:51 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Thu, Apr 06, 2017 at 11:49:14AM +0200, Martin Kletzander wrote:On Thu, Apr 06, 2017 at 04:20:06PM +0800, Eli Qiao wrote:This patch is based on Martin's cache branch.This patch amends the cache bank capability as follow:<bank id='0' level='3' type='unified' size='15360' unit='KiB' cpus='0-5'/><control min='768' unit='KiB' type='unified' nclos='4'/><bank id='1' level='3' type='unified' size='15360' unit='KiB' cpus='6-11'/><control min='768' unit='KiB' type='unified' nclos='4'/>Either the XML is malformed, or the indentation is wrong. The indentationsuggests you want nested XML elements, but the parent element is an emptytag, so you've actually got a flat namespace here.
<cache>
<bank id='0' level='3' type='unified' size='15360' unit='KiB' cpus='0-5'/>
<control min='768' unit='KiB' type='unified' nallocations='4'/>
<bank id='1' level='3' type='unified' size='15360' unit='KiB' cpus='6-11'/>
<control min='768' unit='KiB' type='unified' nallocations='4'/>
</cache>
I validate it online, no errors, the result is:
Were we exposing the number of CLoS IDs before? Was there a discussionabout it? Do we want to expose them? Probably yes, I'm just wondering.What are CLoS IDs and what are they used for ?Regards,Daniel--|: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :|--libvir-list mailing list
-- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list