On 04/04/2017 09:27 AM, Jiri Denemark wrote:
On Tue, Apr 04, 2017 at 09:24:41 +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote:The symbol was introduced in the 3.2.0 release (bb09798fbeb5f) and not 3.1.0 release as its current placement in the file suggests. Signed-off-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@xxxxxxxxxx> --- src/libvirt_public.syms | 6 +++++- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/libvirt_public.syms b/src/libvirt_public.syms index 428cf2e..37a8a18 100644 --- a/src/libvirt_public.syms +++ b/src/libvirt_public.syms @@ -755,8 +755,12 @@ LIBVIRT_3.0.0 { LIBVIRT_3.1.0 { global: - virDomainSetBlockThreshold; virDomainSetVcpu; } LIBVIRT_3.0.0; +LIBVIRT_3.2.0 { + global: + virDomainSetBlockThreshold; +} LIBVIRT_3.1.0; + # .... define new API here using predicted next version number ....Oh, this is unfortunate. But doesn't this change break ABI?
Well, the change I'm referring to in the commit message broke ABI in the first place. This will break ABI only for apps linked with 3.2.0 release and un-break apps linked with every other release.
Michal -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
