On 03/28/2017 05:08 AM, Michal Privoznik wrote:
> On 03/28/2017 02:22 AM, Laine Stump wrote:
>> On 03/22/2017 10:43 AM, Michal Privoznik wrote:
>
>>
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>> src/network/bridge_driver.c | 21 +++++++++------------
>>> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/src/network/bridge_driver.c b/src/network/bridge_driver.c
>>> index a753cd78b..0ea8e2348 100644
>>> --- a/src/network/bridge_driver.c
>>> +++ b/src/network/bridge_driver.c
>>> @@ -470,6 +470,7 @@ networkUpdateState(virNetworkObjPtr obj,
>>> {
>>> virNetworkDriverStatePtr driver = opaque;
>>> dnsmasqCapsPtr dnsmasq_caps = networkGetDnsmasqCaps(driver);
>>> + char *macMapFile = NULL;
>>> int ret = -1;
>>>
>>> virObjectLock(obj);
>>> @@ -486,6 +487,13 @@ networkUpdateState(virNetworkObjPtr obj,
>>> /* If bridge doesn't exist, then mark it inactive */
>>> if (!(obj->def->bridge && virNetDevExists(obj->def->bridge)
>>> == 1))
>>> obj->active = 0;
>>> +
>>> + if (!(macMapFile = networkMacMgrFileName(driver,
>>> obj->def->bridge)))
>>> + goto cleanup;
>>> +
>>> + if (!(obj->macmap = virMacMapNew(macMapFile)))
>>> + goto cleanup;
>>> +
>>> break;
>>
>>
>> ... but from what I can understand, the only differences are:
>>
>> 1) the macMapFile used to be regenerated right after reading the
>> radvdpidfile (which in most cases doesn't exist because I think most of
>> the time that same duty is handled by dnsmasq instead), and now it is
>> regenerated *just before* reading radvdpidfile.
>
> I don't think this is any problem. It's just an ordering issue. Those
> two features are orthogonal.
>
>>
>> 2) it used to be regenerated for any network with a def->bridge (so it
>> would also happen for "unmanaged" bridge networks, where libvirt just
>> points to an already-existing bridge), and it is now regenerated only
>> for networks where libvirt creates and destroys the bridge (and might
>> have a dnsmasq instance running.
I was wrong about this part. Previously the call to create macMapFile
we're talking about happened during network driver initialization for
any *active* network that had IP addresses defined on the network (and
it just happens that a libvirt network can only have IP addresses
defined if we are managing the bridge and running dnsmasq).
With this patch, it is created during network driver initialization for
any network that has forward mode = nat/route/open/none (i.e. any
network that libvirt is running dnsmasq for). It's no longer inside a
check for networking being active/not, but anyway networkUpdateState()
returns immediately when it's called if the network isn't already active
anyway.
So essentially the code is doing the same thing it previously did.
>
> Ah. Is that right? I agree that the code is a bit unclear, but the
> following should be true:
>
> 1) when a network is being freshly started up, the virMacMap module is
> created and stored in the network object if and only if dnsmasq is
> spawned (because only then it's us who assigns IP addresses).
>
> 2) when an interface is allocated/freed from a network that has the
> module, the $br.macs file is updated accordingly. The file is created on
> the first interface allocation, and unlinked on network undef.
>
> 3) when the daemon restarts, networkUpdateState() is called for every
> running network. And if the $br.macs file exists for given network, the
> module is created (we are reconstructing the network objects after all)
> and the file is parsed to restore the previous state. Note, that the
> dnsmasq is not spawned again - it kept running while libvirtd was
> restarting.
>
> Now, there are two problems that I see:
>
> a) if there is no interface added in the 2nd step and the libvirt daemon
> is restarted, in the 3rd step the file does not exist and thus the code
> thinks no virMacMap module was used for the network so it does not
> create one. This is obviously a bug.
>
> b) if you want to have the module for your network, you need to shut it
> down (and thus cut off your domains from the connectivity) and start
> over again. It's very annoying. When implementing this, my reasoning was
> that it's better to give no results than partial results, it's better to
> not have no $br.macs file than have a file containing just newly
> allocated interfaces. Well, I was wrong. I think people don't want to
> destroy their network unless really necessary. More so if the network
> continues running even when the daemon is killed.
Yeah, I agree with that.
>
> Therefore, what I am suggesting here is to rework step 3) so that the
> module is created more frequently. It would solve both problems I'm
> describing.
But I don't think you are creating it any more frequently than before.
You're doing it at exactly the same times as previously.
In the end, I don't have anything *against* this patch, I just don't
think it's doing anything useful.
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
