On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 05:31:42PM +0800, Eli Qiao wrote:
-- Best regards Eli 天涯无处不重逢 a leaf duckweed belongs to the sea, where not to meet in life Sent with Sparrow (http://www.sparrowmailapp.com/?sig)
OK, please do something with your client. Having the footer here on top for every reply is *sooooo* bothersome when you are replying inline (that part is fine).
On Wednesday, 29 March 2017 at 5:19 PM, Martin Kletzander wrote:On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 04:22:16PM +0800, Eli Qiao wrote: > > > -- > Best regards > Eli > > 天涯无处不重逢 > a leaf duckweed belongs to the sea, where not to meet in life > > Sent with Sparrow (http://www.sparrowmailapp.com/?sig) > > > On Wednesday, 29 March 2017 at 3:45 PM, Martin Kletzander wrote: > > > On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 03:22:34PM +0800, Eli Qiao wrote: > > > hi Martin > > > > > > (cc libvir-list) > > > > > > I am a little confused about cat support. > > > > > > I am currently rebasing my code on top of pre-cat branch from your private github repo, today when I check it you have removed it and create a cat branch and there are some related code pushed[1], can I know what ’s your plan for my patch set for CAT support ? should I continue my rebasing work? your though? > > > > So we can work together on that. Since the rework of the sysfs > > functions, some patches are easier to write from scratch then rewrite, > > but I'm now just trying to setup the test suite, so that we have > > something to test on, at least some of the code. So where are you in > > the rebase right now? Do you think anything from the virsysfs.c code > > could be enhanced? > > > > > > > Not so fast, only the first patch [1], I found that nodeinfo.c is removed :( > > I think we need to extend virResCtrlGetInfoStr and virResCtrlGetInfoUint to virsysfs.c > > thought ? Yeah, we should wrap around /sys/fs/resctrl as we do with /sys/devices/system so that it can be easily tested.Sure, working on it, and done, will push it for review. Also I will push some fake data for resctrl testing..Also I got another idea about keeping the resource info. There is no need for any global data to be stored as you are re-reading almost all of it. The only info that stays the same is caches (that is already saved in capabilities) and what caches are available for resource control (that will be there as well). So I don't think we need yet another global data storage.Do you mean, we re-create all struct (reading them from /sys/fs/resctrl) when we create/destroy instance? also, for get free cache ?
You have to update that for every request anyway, so what's the point of keeping the data when they immediately become old?
This is what I did in my early PoC, that will much easier… but please keep in mind that only one thread can read/write to /sys/fs/resctrl at one time.
Yeah, that's what we have locks for.
the neck bottle is /sys/fs/resctrl
Sure you mean bottleneck, right? :)
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
