On 03/28/2017 01:54 PM, Stepan Andr wrote:
Hi all,
It seems there is a bug for libvirtd which I couldn't find here
<https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?component=libvirt&limit=0&order=bug_id%20DESC&product=Virtualization%20Tools&query_format=advanced>
.
*Here is description:*
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
Libvirt - 3.1.0 (built from tarball)
How reproducible:
100%
Precondition: libvirtd running. One VM is running, other(s) are 'shut off'.
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Stop libvirtd while VM#1 is running.
2. Start libvirtd (VM#1 is running).
3. Stop VM#1. Verify if VM#1 is present in the list of all VM's ('virsh
list --all').
4. Start VM#1. Verify if VM#1 is present in the list of all VM's ('virsh
list --all').
5. Go to step #3. Note: Steps may be needed to repeat two times.
Recover action:
restart libvirtd service (service libvirtd restart/systemctl restart
libvirtd).
Actual results:
#3. VM#1 disappears from the list of all VM's.
Expected results:
#3. VM#1 should be present in the list of all VM's.
I'm unable to reproduce this behaviour. Can you:
a) share the domain XML with us?
b) provide daemon debug logs [1]?
c) check that all the uuids for your domains are unique?
1: http://wiki.libvirt.org/page/DebugLogs
BTW: Feel free to open a new bug and attach those informations there.
Bugzilla is where bugs are tracked anyway.
Thanks,
Michal
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
