Re: [PATCH] conf: validate that PCI controller index is < 256

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 03/27/2017 03:41 AM, Martin Kletzander wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 26, 2017 at 08:49:28PM -0400, Laine Stump wrote:
>> This is the maximum for many reasons, for starters because index ==
>> bus number, and a controller's bus number is 8 bits.
>>
>> This incidentally resolves: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1329090
>> ---
>> src/conf/domain_conf.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/src/conf/domain_conf.c b/src/conf/domain_conf.c
>> index 6bbc6a2..2139ab0 100644
>> --- a/src/conf/domain_conf.c
>> +++ b/src/conf/domain_conf.c
>> @@ -4846,6 +4846,24 @@ virDomainNetDefValidate(const virDomainNetDef
>> *net)
>>
>>
>> static int
>> +virDomainControllerDefValidate(const virDomainControllerDef *controller)
>> +{
>> +    if (controller->type == VIR_DOMAIN_CONTROLLER_TYPE_PCI) {
>> +        if (controller->idx > 255) {
>> +            virReportError(VIR_ERR_CONFIG_UNSUPPORTED,
>> +                           _("PCI controller index %d too high, or
>> too many "
> 
> The first line might be enough, maybe adding the max value there.

Okay, I adjusted it.

> 
>> +                             "PCI controllers. A maximum of 256 PCI "
>> +                             "controllers is allowed, and the maximum
>> value "
>> +                             "of the index attribute is 255"),
>> +                           controller->idx);
>> +            return -1;
>> +        }
>> +    }
>> +    return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +
>> +static int
>> virDomainDeviceDefValidateInternal(const virDomainDeviceDef *dev,
>>                                    const virDomainDef *def)
>> {
>> @@ -4867,6 +4885,7 @@ virDomainDeviceDefValidateInternal(const
>> virDomainDeviceDef *dev,
>>     case VIR_DOMAIN_DEVICE_HOSTDEV:
>>     case VIR_DOMAIN_DEVICE_WATCHDOG:
>>     case VIR_DOMAIN_DEVICE_CONTROLLER:
>> +        return virDomainControllerDefValidate(dev->data.controller);
> 
> Do you really mean to fall-through from hostdev, watchdog and so on? ;)

No, it was just late in the day, I was on a roll and didn't pay
attention. I moved this up above the other NOP cases. I'm just attaching
the patch here. Is that good enough for an ACK, or do you want a full
re-send?


> 
>>     case VIR_DOMAIN_DEVICE_GRAPHICS:
>>     case VIR_DOMAIN_DEVICE_HUB:
>>     case VIR_DOMAIN_DEVICE_SMARTCARD:
>> -- 
>> 2.9.3
>>
>> -- 
>> libvir-list mailing list
>> libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list

>From 4416cde9d9ce36581b56a3de905122c54c2cfb0e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Laine Stump <laine@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2017 20:47:17 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] conf: validate that PCI controller index is < 256

This is the maximum for many reasons, for starters because index ==
bus number, and a controller's bus number is 8 bits.

This incidentally resolves: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1329090
---
 src/conf/domain_conf.c | 19 ++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/src/conf/domain_conf.c b/src/conf/domain_conf.c
index 6bbc6a2..b463f3b 100644
--- a/src/conf/domain_conf.c
+++ b/src/conf/domain_conf.c
@@ -4846,6 +4846,21 @@ virDomainNetDefValidate(const virDomainNetDef *net)
 
 
 static int
+virDomainControllerDefValidate(const virDomainControllerDef *controller)
+{
+    if (controller->type == VIR_DOMAIN_CONTROLLER_TYPE_PCI) {
+        if (controller->idx > 255) {
+            virReportError(VIR_ERR_CONFIG_UNSUPPORTED,
+                           _("PCI controller index %d too high, maximum is 255"),
+                           controller->idx);
+            return -1;
+        }
+    }
+    return 0;
+}
+
+
+static int
 virDomainDeviceDefValidateInternal(const virDomainDeviceDef *dev,
                                    const virDomainDef *def)
 {
@@ -4859,6 +4874,9 @@ virDomainDeviceDefValidateInternal(const virDomainDeviceDef *dev,
     case VIR_DOMAIN_DEVICE_NET:
         return virDomainNetDefValidate(dev->data.net);
 
+    case VIR_DOMAIN_DEVICE_CONTROLLER:
+        return virDomainControllerDefValidate(dev->data.controller);
+
     case VIR_DOMAIN_DEVICE_LEASE:
     case VIR_DOMAIN_DEVICE_FS:
     case VIR_DOMAIN_DEVICE_INPUT:
@@ -4866,7 +4884,6 @@ virDomainDeviceDefValidateInternal(const virDomainDeviceDef *dev,
     case VIR_DOMAIN_DEVICE_VIDEO:
     case VIR_DOMAIN_DEVICE_HOSTDEV:
     case VIR_DOMAIN_DEVICE_WATCHDOG:
-    case VIR_DOMAIN_DEVICE_CONTROLLER:
     case VIR_DOMAIN_DEVICE_GRAPHICS:
     case VIR_DOMAIN_DEVICE_HUB:
     case VIR_DOMAIN_DEVICE_SMARTCARD:
-- 
2.9.3

--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list

[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]
  Powered by Linux