Re: [PATCH 0/8] Memory locking fixes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 02:01:34PM -0400, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
On Thu, 23 Mar 2017 19:16:39 +0100
Andrea Bolognani <abologna@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

A problem reported recently to the mailing list[1] uncovered
some flaws in the way we deal with setting the memory locking
limit for QEMU guests.

This series solves those issues and adds test suite coverage
to hopefully prevent more bugs from popping up in the future.

Tested-by: Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@xxxxxxxxxx>



[1] https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2017-March/msg00534.html

Andrea Bolognani (8):
  Revert "qemu: Forbid <memoryBacking><locked> without
    <memtune><hard_limit>"
  qemu: Remove qemuDomainRequiresMemLock()
  qemu: Fix memory locking limit calculation
  process: Translate "unlimited" correctly
  command: Introduce virCommandGetMaxMemLock()
  tests: Introduce virTestCompareToULL()

ACK to these first 6.  I have to at least mention that I don't like the
fact that we need the sixth one, but we do and that's how the compare
functions work =)

  tests: Introduce QEMU memory locking limit tests
  docs: Improve documentation related to memory locking

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list

[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]
  Powered by Linux