On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 06:05:49PM +0200, Henrik Persson E wrote: > > Hi, > > Well it doesn't really do the trick, since it maps to "linux-lvm" and > "linux-raid" which is not a valid fs-type for parted. But maybe I should > update the enum to reflect the valid fs-types of parted if that was the > intention of the enum? Ah I see what you mean. Don't change the existing enum, but just define another one that does a suitable mapping for parted's needs. Daniel -- |: Red Hat, Engineering, London -o- http://people.redhat.com/berrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org -o- http://ovirt.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: GnuPG: 7D3B9505 -o- F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 :| -- Libvir-list mailing list Libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list