On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 09:16:26AM +0100, Andreas Sommer wrote: > I'm wondering if there will be vTPM support in libvirt in the near > future?! Xen does support it already with the configuration "vtpm = > ['instance=1,backend=0']", for example. > > So it would be great if the libvirt XML format supported it, too... For > example like this: > > <devices> > <vtpm instance="1" backend="xxx" /> > </devices> > > Both attributes are optional. The backend attribute is a VM ID (on Xen, > only zero for dom0 is supported) and could be implemented as a UUID?! I'd just ignore 'backend' for now - none of the other existing devices suport anything other than dom0 as the backend, so its no loss to assume dom0 for TPM too. What is 'instance' ? For element I'd prefer to just call it '<tpm>' - the 'v' is redundant since every device is virtual here :-) > What do you think? Are there any efforts to introducing that? No one has ever asked for it before, which is why we've not supported this to date. I don't have any objection to supporting it, so patches would be welcomed. Regards, Daniel -- |: Red Hat, Engineering, London -o- http://people.redhat.com/berrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org -o- http://ovirt.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: GnuPG: 7D3B9505 -o- F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 :| -- Libvir-list mailing list Libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list