Re: [PATCH 1/6] bhyve: virBhyveProbeCaps: BHYVE_CAP_LPC_BOOTROM

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



  Fabian Freyer wrote:

> On 08.03.2017 18:19, Michal Privoznik wrote:
> > ACK, but we really need a better way to detect capabilites. For instance
> > now, bhyve binary is executed 4 times just to find out whether it
> > supports 4 capabilities. That's just madness. Maybe we can get in touch
> > with bhyve developers and ask them? Maybe it could have a monitor just
> > like qemu has, or something.
> There's a patch[1] for it, but it would need to be moved along.
> Unfortunately, we would still need to somehow fall back to this for
> backwards compatibility...
> 
> Fabian
> 
>  [1] https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210111

Yeah, I'll at least rebase this patch onto the current codebase, but I
plan to finish some of the libvirt stuff first (merge this uefi series
with the changes suggested by Michal, add tablet support, update the
docs and add virtio-console support).

Roman Bogorodskiy

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list

[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]
  Powered by Linux