On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 5:39:52 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > FWIW, the virObject framework as it exists today was just the bare > minimum we needed in order to get a basic inheritance system up and > running in libvirt. I rather expected that we would extend it in the > future to add further concepts, inspired/borrowed from glib (which > is what stimulated my creation of virObject in the first place). Why not just switch to GObject instead? I can kinda see the appeal in having our own, stripped down and simplified version of GObject, but if we're going to start adding back more features we might as well avoid reinventing the wheel and take advantage of the existing, battle-tested implementation. -- Andrea Bolognani <abologna@xxxxxxxxxx> -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
