On Thu, 16 Feb 2017 17:49:45 +0100
Erik Skultety <eskultet@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Since mdevs are just another type of VFIO devices, we should increase
> the memory locking limit the same way we do for VFIO PCI devices.
>
> Signed-off-by: Erik Skultety <eskultet@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> src/qemu/qemu_domain.c | 9 +++++----
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/src/qemu/qemu_domain.c b/src/qemu/qemu_domain.c
> index eb86385..bdd687f 100644
> --- a/src/qemu/qemu_domain.c
> +++ b/src/qemu/qemu_domain.c
> @@ -6222,11 +6222,12 @@ qemuDomainRequiresMemLock(virDomainDefPtr def)
> return true;
>
> for (i = 0; i < def->nhostdevs; i++) {
> - virDomainHostdevDefPtr dev = def->hostdevs[i];
> + virDomainHostdevSubsysPtr subsys = &def->hostdevs[i]->source.subsys;
>
> - if (dev->mode == VIR_DOMAIN_HOSTDEV_MODE_SUBSYS &&
> - dev->source.subsys.type == VIR_DOMAIN_HOSTDEV_SUBSYS_TYPE_PCI &&
> - dev->source.subsys.u.pci.backend == VIR_DOMAIN_HOSTDEV_PCI_BACKEND_VFIO)
> + if (def->hostdevs[i]->mode == VIR_DOMAIN_HOSTDEV_MODE_SUBSYS &&
> + (subsys->type == VIR_DOMAIN_HOSTDEV_SUBSYS_TYPE_MDEV ||
> + (subsys->type == VIR_DOMAIN_HOSTDEV_SUBSYS_TYPE_PCI &&
> + subsys->u.pci.backend == VIR_DOMAIN_HOSTDEV_PCI_BACKEND_VFIO)))
> return true;
> }
>
Nice! For series:
Tested-by: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@xxxxxxxxxx>
(with KVMGT vGPU mdev)
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
