On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 03:51:48PM +0400, marcandre.lureau@xxxxxxxxxx wrote: > From: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@xxxxxxxxxx> > > I am working on a WIP series to add QEMU Spice/virgl rendernode option. > Since rendernodes are not stable across reboots, I propose that QEMU > accepts also a PCI address (other bus types may be added in the future). Hmm, can you elaborate on this aspect ? It feels like a parallel to saying NIC device names are not stable, so we should configure guests using PCI addresses instead of 'eth0', etc but we stuck with using NIC names in libvirt on the basis that you can create udev rules to ensure stable naming ? So is there not a case to be made that if you want stable render device names when multiple NICs are present, then you should use udev to ensure a given device always maps to the same PCI dev. > This is how I translated it to libvirt. I picked <gpu> over > <rendernode>, since it seems more generic. Comments welcome! Regards, Daniel -- |: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :| |: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
