On 02/10/2017 02:56 PM, Boris Fiuczynski wrote: > On a system with 697 SCSI disks each configured with 8 paths the command > virsh nodedev-list fails with > error: Failed to list node devices > error: internal error: Too many node_devices '16816' for limit '16384' > Increasing the upper limit on lists of node devices from 16K to 64K. > > Signed-off-by: Boris Fiuczynski <fiuczy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > src/remote/remote_protocol.x | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/src/remote/remote_protocol.x b/src/remote/remote_protocol.x > index 68469a5..cd0a14c 100644 > --- a/src/remote/remote_protocol.x > +++ b/src/remote/remote_protocol.x > @@ -86,7 +86,7 @@ const REMOTE_STORAGE_POOL_LIST_MAX = 4096; > const REMOTE_STORAGE_VOL_LIST_MAX = 16384; > > /* Upper limit on lists of node devices. */ > -const REMOTE_NODE_DEVICE_LIST_MAX = 16384; > +const REMOTE_NODE_DEVICE_LIST_MAX = 65536; > > /* Upper limit on lists of node device capabilities. */ > const REMOTE_NODE_DEVICE_CAPS_LIST_MAX = 65536; > ACKed and pushed. I think history proved that raising these limits is okay. I did some research of the generated code myself too and both client & server can cope with the changed limit and different limit on the other side too (i.e. older client talking to newer server and vice versa). Michal -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
