On Wed, Feb 08, 2017 at 06:11:30PM +0300, Maxim Nestratov wrote:
08-Feb-17 17:52, Martin Kletzander пишет:On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 01:21:48PM +0300, Nikolay Shirokovskiy wrote:By the way we came to agreement to create distinct API to support backup operations in [1] and there is a discussion of pull backup series in [2]. The latter is blocked as some necessary operations are still experimental in qemu. [1] https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2016-March/msg00937.html [2] https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2016-September/msg00192.htmlI went through the conversations and I feel quite better about understanding the code, would you mind sending a new version (no matter whether it's an RFC or not) to the list so it's applicable (and hopefully will draw more attention)?Just to have more context. The continuation of the thread [1] went to https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2016-April/msg00401.html
Of course, with the great mailman =) Thanks for pointing that out ;)
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
